top of page

Following the publication of the Amersfoort Agenda, EAC Board was very active in responding to some of the priorities that were identified. A survey was conducted on the subject of ‘Making Choices’ with particular reference to development-led (or preventive / rescue) archaeology. The results were published in summary in EAC Occasional Paper 13, and in full in the Making Choices report, and were the subject of sessions at EAA 2017 and at our 2018 EAC Symposium in Sofia. EAC wanted to establish what would help member states most in making the case for the public value from development-led archaeology. This is vital in the context of increasing scrutiny of the system and thus in the protection of one of the key means of archaeological heritage management.

The Making Choices survey helped to identify four main areas where the EAC could help develop guidance to improve consistency and transparency. All four areas have been translated into actions, which have been taken on by three new EAC Working Groups and the existing EAC Working Group for Archaeological Archives. 

The Making the case for development-led archaeology working group is one of these new three working groups. Its main objective is to provide a toolkit for archaeological heritage managers to help them articulate the wide range of benefits and enormous public value arising from a system of development-led archaeology (whether public or privately funded), and to demonstrate the potential of proportionality and transparency. 

Making the case for development-led archaeology
Making the case WG web page.jpg

Barney Sloane (UK) - chair

Ann Degraeve (Belgium)

Eszter Kreiter (Hungary)

Anu Lillak (Estonia)

Marjolein Verschuur (The Netherlands)

Jon Seligman (Israel)

Jonas van Looveren (Belgium)

Lyudmil Vagalinski (Bulgaria) 

Michael MacDonagh (Ireland)

Kurt Farrugia (Malta)

Sadie Watson (UK)

Annemarie Willems (EAA)- corresponding member


bottom of page